Luke Hansford



🌱 Seedling2 min read

There are three ways in which participants can contribute to a meeting: 1) input, 2) decision, 3) commitment. If a person cannot make any of these three contributions, don’t invite the person because this person just needs to be informed by broadcasting the meeting notes. 1

I think this is something I'd like to move towards running a remote team. Currently the default for a lot of meetings is to invite the whole team/groups of people, but this is mostly just for knowledge sharing which can be achieved by good note taking instead (which is more beneficial anyone as it creates a concrete record of decisions/direction).

The "commitment" part is the most unclear to me, but I like Mike Crittenden's explanation that it "means you cannot move forward without that specific person committing (even if they disagree)". 2

Stop calling meetings so you can simply organize your own thoughts with witnesses .3

I've been guilty of this, and I work with people who are guilty of this. I think this is relevant to the quote further up of the reasons to be part of a meeting - noticeably information sharing is not one of them. I think for a successful remote working organisation (even non-remote!) this is key, and that knowledge sharing should be done as asynchronously as possible. Meetings are ephemeral and there will be loss of knowledge.



No one has interacted with this page yet.